Skip to content

Add function Math.nearestInteger #4495

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

beutlich
Copy link
Member

Cherry-picked from #3247 as proposed by #3247 (review).

@beutlich beutlich added enhancement New feature or enhancement L: Math Issue addresses Modelica.Math labels Oct 27, 2024
@beutlich beutlich added this to the MSL4.2.0 milestone Oct 27, 2024
@beutlich beutlich mentioned this pull request Oct 27, 2024
4 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@casella casella left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@casella casella requested review from AHaumer and maltelenz November 11, 2024 16:11
Copy link
Contributor

@henrikt-ma henrikt-ma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

More though seems needed on how to obtain a useable expression variability of the function result.

@henrikt-ma henrikt-ma self-requested a review November 12, 2024 08:10
Copy link
Contributor

@henrikt-ma henrikt-ma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(Just restoring my Request changes after changing my mind back and forth.)

Copy link
Contributor

@HansOlsson HansOlsson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The general idea is good, but when using it outside of functions it becomes messy.

It seems we need the annotation GenerateEvents=true and update such functions in terms of variability, e.g., along the lines of modelica/ModelicaSpecification#3610

@beutlich beutlich force-pushed the add-nearest-integer branch from 5c4e708 to 8fb0347 Compare February 2, 2025 09:49
@beutlich
Copy link
Member Author

beutlich commented Feb 2, 2025

The general idea is good, but when using it outside of functions it becomes messy.

I removed the usage in block Modelica.Blocks.Math.RealToInteger. @casella @HansOlsson Please add your review again.

@beutlich beutlich force-pushed the add-nearest-integer branch from 235f587 to 684aed4 Compare February 11, 2025 17:49
@HansOlsson HansOlsson self-requested a review March 13, 2025 12:17
Copy link
Contributor

@HansOlsson HansOlsson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.
Combined with modelica/ModelicaSpecification#3610 it will be generally useful.

One could possibly add "away from zero" already in description as the preferred method depends, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rounding (But it may also be too long.)

@beutlich beutlich force-pushed the add-nearest-integer branch from 862dc25 to 728fd63 Compare March 18, 2025 19:20
@beutlich
Copy link
Member Author

One could possibly add "away from zero" already in description

Incorporated. Fell free to review this last change.

@henrikt-ma may I kindly ask for a second review. Thanks.

@beutlich beutlich requested review from AHaumer, DagBruck and henrikt-ma and removed request for AHaumer and henrikt-ma March 18, 2025 19:21
Copy link
Contributor

@henrikt-ma henrikt-ma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this can be accepted until it is relying on language features of a released version of the specification. According to current semantics, the output of this is a non-discrete-time Integer, which I'm pretty sure is not the intention.

@beutlich beutlich marked this pull request as draft March 21, 2025 11:21
@beutlich beutlich force-pushed the add-nearest-integer branch from 728fd63 to be66842 Compare April 22, 2025 04:55
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 22, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or enhancement L: Math Issue addresses Modelica.Math
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants