Skip to content

DBM: Add query retention period section #28992

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2025
Merged

DBM: Add query retention period section #28992

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2025
+10 −1

Conversation

drichards-87
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

Adds a query retention period to the Database Monitoring Data Collected doc. Requested by PM.

Merge instructions

Merge readiness:

  • Ready for merge

For Datadog employees:
Merge queue is enabled in this repo. Your branch name MUST follow the <name>/<description> convention and include the forward slash (/). Without this format, your pull request will not pass in CI, the GitLab pipeline will not run, and you won't get a branch preview. Getting a branch preview makes it easier for us to check any issues with your PR, such as broken links.

If your branch doesn't follow this format, rename it or create a new branch and PR.

To have your PR automatically merged after it receives the required reviews, add the following PR comment:

/merge

Additional notes

@drichards-87 drichards-87 added WORK IN PROGRESS No review needed, it's a wip ;) Do Not Merge Just do not merge this PR :) labels Apr 25, 2025
@drichards-87 drichards-87 requested review from a team as code owners April 25, 2025 20:27
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

Preview links (active after the build_preview check completes)

Modified Files

@drichards-87 drichards-87 removed WORK IN PROGRESS No review needed, it's a wip ;) Do Not Merge Just do not merge this PR :) labels Apr 29, 2025
aliciascott
aliciascott approved these changes Apr 29, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@aliciascott aliciascott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good

@drichards-87
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Apr 29, 2025 •
edited
Loading

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-04-29 18:59:59 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2025-04-29 19:00:09 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in master is approximately 20m (p90).

2025-04-29 19:00:41 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request build was cancelled

deforest.richards@datadoghq.com cancelled this merge request build

@drichards-87
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge -c

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Apr 29, 2025 •
edited
Loading

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-04-29 19:00:34 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge -c

@drichards-87
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Apr 29, 2025 •
edited
Loading

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-04-29 20:19:39 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2025-04-29 20:19:46 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in master is approximately 20m (p90).

2025-04-29 20:36:44 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 38a31dd into master Apr 29, 2025
26 of 33 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the deforest/docs-10707-dbm-retention-limits branch April 29, 2025 20:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@aliciascott aliciascott aliciascott approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
mergequeue-status: done
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@drichards-87 @aliciascott