You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The master branch have already been stale for 2 years as shown:
The biggest confuse is when we do rebase upstream from local, very used to rebase the upstream/master branch, and it indeed exist, so can sometimes bring conflict.
Since we're not using the master branch anymore, should we just delete it to avoid any further confuse? or Is there any special reason still keep the master branch?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
The
masterbranch have already been stale for 2 years as shown:The biggest confuse is when we do rebase upstream from local, very used to rebase the upstream/master branch, and it indeed exist, so can sometimes bring conflict.
Since we're not using the
masterbranch anymore, should we just delete it to avoid any further confuse? or Is there any special reason still keep themasterbranch?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions